We need your help with an
important research project. As you know, there is much discussion about the
challenges and opportunities associated with biotechnology. I am chairing a
national task force representing the Land Grant University system in this important
area. Our Task Force is reporting directly to leaders of the Experiment Station
Committee on Organization and Policy (ESCOP) and the Extension Committee on
Organization and Policy (ECOP). The task force membership can be found at:
http://www.escop.msstate.edu/committee/subcom00.htm#agbioimp
We have developed an Internet-based
questionnaire that we need you to complete. Our goal is to better understand
the views of key Land Grant University faculty and administrators, like you,
in order to promote a more effective Land Grant system response to this important
issue. These issues will likely have a significant impact on Land Grant Universities
in the future. To fill out the questionnaire please go to:
http://www.emac.missouri.edu:591/EMACsurveyFolder/default.htm
You have unique insights that will ensure our recommendations truly influence the future of biotechnology and the Land Grant University system. Key groups inside and outside the system are looking forward to reviewing the results of this study. We have kept this questionnaire short because we know you are busy; it should take about 15 minutes to complete. Please be assured that all your answers will be kept completely confidential. Your name will never be associated with the aggregate findings or revealed in any manner as a participant in this study. If you have any questions, you may contact Dr. Nicholas Kalaitzandonakes, Vice Chairman of our task force, at Kalaitzandonakesn@Missouri.edu
Thank you in advance for your time and insights.
Sincerely,
Thomas J. Hoban, Ph.D.
Professor of Sociology and Food Science
College of Agriculture and Life Sciences
North Carolina State University
After accounting for entries in the database for which the email address was
unavailable as well as erroneous or expired email addresses, a total of 14,128
agricultural scientists received the email request. The prospective survey participants
could visit the web page of the survey and examine the instrument in its entirety.
They could complete the survey electronically or abandon the process. They could
complete any part of the survey as there were no required questions. Finally,
care was taken to maintain the anonymity of the participants.
In all, 1802 completed surveys were submitted and received. Hence, the response
rate was almost 13%, a reasonable rate for this type of survey, given the substantial
length of the survey instrument and considering that no incentives were offered
for completion. Also, it was not possible to send out an e-mail reminder. Of
the completed surveys 1330 were usable (completed fully and correctly).
Assistance was provided with data analysis and presentation development by McAllister
Opinion Research - http://www.mcallister-research.com/main.html
Funding and additional assistance was provided by North Carolina State University
and the University of Missouri.