Perspectives OnLine - Summer 2001: Feature Article / "Sex Matters"
Perspectives On Line

NC State University

Summer 2001 Contents Page Features A View to Tomorrow Global Gardens An Arsenal of KnowledgeCorridors to ConservationSex Matters College Profile Noteworthy News Giving Alumni From the Dean College of Agriculture & Life Sciences  

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 


 

Photo by Herman Lankford

n their quest for better health for both men and women, medical professionals and scientists must gain a better understanding of the basic biological differences between men and women and use both sexes in medical studies when appropriate, says Dr. John Vandenbergh, professor in the College’s Department of Zoology.

Vandenbergh was among 16 committee members from across the nation who participated in an 18-month Institute of Medicine (IOM) study on differences between the sexes and how those differences affect health. The committee’s report — Exploring the Biological Contributions to Human Health: Does Sex Matter? — concludes that many normal physiological and disease functions are influenced directly or indirectly by sex-based biological differences.

“The focus of study was on basic biology of sex determination — how do we get to be males and females from a genetic, an endocrine and a developmental point of view,” Vandenbergh said. “And the second part of this was how do these basic differences between us — males and females — cause us to look at diseases in a different way?”

Some basic differences in how men and women respond to disease are well known but not well understood. For instance, women clearly use both the left and right hemispheres of the brain for language tasks, while men tend to use mainly the left hemisphere. Therefore, women are more likely to recover speech after a left-brain stroke, while it is much more difficult for men to recover speech.

Women have a stronger immune response to disease than men, Vandenbergh said, yet women are also more likely to suffer from autoimmune diseases such as multiple sclerosis, lupus and rheumatoid arthritis. And women are nearly twice as vulnerable to diseases caused by tobacco smoke as men, which may account for an increase in the incidence of lung cancer among women.

On the other hand, men are much more likely to suffer from severe mental retardation, which may be the result of disruptions that occur in fetal development. During the complex process in which a fetus is differentiated as male, minor lapses in hormonal or genetic activity could lead to weaknesses in a man later in life.

“Our finding is that significant differences are present in animals and humans as a function of sex. And when investigators conduct studies of human health relevance, they should include sex as a variable wherever it makes much sense. A clearer understanding of these differences could lead to better diagnosis and treatment of diseases,” Vandenbergh said.

One reason for the study was concern over the fact that women are often excluded from clinical studies of diseases and drugs.

The practice dates to a post-World War II law excluding women for liability reasons. It also springs from the practical concern that women, at different stages of their hormonal cycles, have different biochemical reactions to tests. But tests developed in the past decade make it much easier for scientists conducting clinical studies to control for women’s cycles, Vandenbergh said.

The IOM committee recommended some changes in the way clinical studies are done. “Our committee does not recommend that all clinical studies include both men and women. What it does recommend is that investigators and funding agencies make sure they consider using both men and women and evaluate the importance of doing that,” he said.

“If you’re studying the effect of a drug on prostate cancer, it doesn’t make much sense to put women into the study. On the other hand, if you’re studying a drug for breast cancer, it might make sense to put men in some of the studies. Men do have mammary tissue, and they, at a very low rate, get breast cancer. But when they get it, it’s very severe. By including men in a study of breast cancer, you might learn something about women.”

Vandenbergh, whose research interests include hormonal changes during puberty and reproduction, has explored how fetal exposure to sex hormones — the male hormone, testosterone, and the female, estradiol — affects animals later in life. Research has shown that animals’ sexual behavior, anatomy and physiology are influenced by the hormones they encounter in the womb.

Litter-born animals such as rodents and pigs are exposed to sex hormones in utero from other fetuses surrounding them, said Vandenbergh. Research has shown that in utero placement and the consequent exposure to male or female hormones have a lifetime effect on animals, although those effects vary greatly between species.

For instance, female mice that lie between two males in utero — 2M females that experience elevated testosterone before birth — have shorter life periods of fertility than do 2F females, those that lie between two females before birth. Male mice prefer to mate with 2F female mice, and 2M female mice are more aggressive toward other females and to intruders than 2F females.

In gerbils, 2M males that experience elevated testosterone before birth are more sexually proficient than 2F males. But 2F male gerbils, those exposed to elevated estradiol, show better parental instincts than 2M males.

“There’s growing evidence to suggest that humans may be influenced by prenatal hormone exposure, perhaps not as dramatically as animals because most humans are born as singletons,” Vandenbergh said. Human studies of fraternal twins have shown that girls with a twin brother, who were therefore exposed to testosterone in utero, show some slight masculine tendencies later in life.

“This does not mean that hormones are your destiny,” Vandenbergh said. “But it does mean that hormones shape your choices. And genes don’t control your destiny, but they do control some of your orientations, some selections and patterns of adult characteristics.”

Vandenbergh acknowledges that members of the IOM committee differed on the age-old issue of whether nature or nurture controls male and female differences. Though it is widely recognized, for example, that women have a greater tendency for osteoporosis — brittle bones — later in life, there are questions as to why. Are women less likely to engage in physical activities that could strengthen their bones because they are not as physically capable as men (nature), or is it because women are not encouraged to participate in physical activity and therefore are less interested than men (nurture)?

There was a time when the women’s movement would not accept that differences between the sexes existed beyond genitalia and hormones. And that position probably afforded women better access to jobs and other opportunities from which they had been excluded traditionally, Vandenbergh said.

But while some good has resulted from that position, it also has led to misinformation. The committee’s report suggests that there is much to be gained through a better understanding of how hormonal and genetic differences between men and women affect health.


 


Previous PageTop of Page Next Page