Unit 15 Lecture Notes -
Emergency Planning and Community Right-to-Know Act (EPCRA)
|
|
"On the night of December 2nd-3rd 1984, 40 tons of methyl isocyanate, hydrogen cyanide, mono-methyl amine and other lethal gases began spewing from Union Carbide Corporations pesticide factory in Bhopal, India. Nobody outside the factory was warned because the safety siren was turned off. Not until the gas was upon them in their beds, searing their eyes, filling their mouths and lungs, did the communities of Bhopal know of their danger. "Gasping for breath and near blind people stampeded into narrow alleys..... Dawn broke over residential streets littered with corpses..... Over half a million people were exposed .... Nobody knows how many died but in the next days more than 7,000 death shrouds were sold in Bhopal. With an estimated 10-15 people continuing to die each month the number of deaths to date is put at close to 20,000. And today more than 120,000 people are still in need of urgent medical attention."How could it happen? The immediate causes of the disaster are related to a cost-cutting drive initiated by Union Carbide Corporation. The moves directed at enhancing profits included reducing the number of personnel; lowering minimal training for operatives from six months to 15 days; use of low quality construction material and day labour; cutting down on vital safety measures and the adoption of hazardous operating procedures. "In 1981 a plant operator was killed by a phosgene gas leak. A further phosgene leak in January 1982 severely injured 28 workers and in the same year MIC escaped from a broken valve resulting in four workers being exposed to the chemical. In addition to this workers were subject to routine low level exposure. The results of clandestine medical tests conducted on the workers by Carbide doctors were sent to the US and never released. A 'business confidential' safety audit conducted by a US team in May 1982 identified "61 hazards, 30 of them major and 11 in the dangerous phosgene/MIC units". Nothing was done. |
The above excerpt is from the web site of a Bhopal survivors group, <http://www.bhopal.net/index1.html>. The facts surrounding that fateful night remain very much in dispute (and in litigation); nonetheless, no one disputes that something went terribly wrong. A U.S. Congressional investigation revealed similar flaws in plants in the US Moreover, the investigators found that nothing in either federal or the laws of most states compelled owners of plants to share any information with local communities. Local communities were left with no information for planning their response to disasters such as these.
As a result of its investigation, Congress enacted the Emergency Planning and Community Right-to-Know Act (EPCRA) of 1986 as Title III of the Superfund Amendments and Reauthorization Acts of 1986 (SARA Title III). EPCRA provides a comprehensive mechanism for public awareness and planning of chemicals stored, used, or released into a community. SARA Title III has three primary components. The first is emergency planning and notification that involves planning by local emergency responders and their counterparts in local industrial facilities, and notification by the owners or operators of those facilities of any unplanned release of hazardous material from those facilities. The second part of the law requires all owners and operators of covered facilities to annually report all chemical releases from those facilities. The EPA publishes this information on an annual basis. The third part of the statute is general provisions applicable to all information collected and reported.
EPCRA established response commissions, planning districts, and local committees. It required that EPA develop a list of covered chemicals and thresholds for each chemical on the list. Any facility with at least the threshold amount of a covered chemical was defined as a covered facility under EPCRA, unless exempt. EPCRA explicitly authorized states to designate additional facilities as covered. The definition of covered facility goes well beyond what one ordinary thinks of as industrial facilities. For example, community swimming pools typically store sufficient quantities of pool chemicals to make them covered facilities. Exempt facilities include vessels, motor vehicles, rolling stock and aircraft since these are covered under other law. Note, however, that releases from these must nonetheless be reported under EPCRA.
Much of the work under EPCRA is the responsibility of local planning districts that are required to develop local emergency response plans. Each plan must identify covered facilities and transportation routes for hazardous materials. Additionally the plan must identify other facilities that are at risk as the result of their proximity to covered facilities or transportation routes. The plan must also contain detailed information about the methods to be used for handling specific releases. Community emergency coordinators facilitate the process fort the community, while facility coordinators perform the same function for each covered facility. Notification, in the event of a release, is required and the plan must list all that must receive notification for each anticipated type of release. The plan must also address the process for determining that a release has occurred and the affected population. The plan must describe emergency equipment, and list persons responsible for equipment and facilities. Evacuation plans, training programs and constant practice are also essential parts of any good plan.
A key component of compliance under EPCRA is maintaining material safety data sheets (MSDS) for each covered chemical. MSDSs are usually provided by the manufacturer or supplier of the covered chemicals. All MSDS for a site should be kept in an accessible location at the site. First responders also need their own set of MSDS for all chemicals that are likely to be found within their jurisdiction. An MSDS contains information about a chemical that is needed to respond to a release. This will include a description of the chemical and its properties including toxicity and appropriate handling and first aid procedures.
Another important part of EPCRA is the Toxic Release Inventory (TRI) Program. <http://www.epa.gov/tri/> The purpose of the TRI Program is to make available to the public information about routine (and other) toxic releases by covered facilities. Releases include those to air, surface water, and land, and those made by underground injection. Both on-site and off-site releases must be reported. The EPA publishes an annual inventory of the releases reported from each covered facility. Facility owners or operators are required to complete toxic chemical release forms for all releases, whether accidental or routine.
Absent an exception, all information provided under EPCRA is available to the public. This includes release data, emergency situations and emergency response plans. An exception is made for trade secrets. A trade secret is any information not generally known to the public that tends to support the profitability of the owner's business. EPCRA provides procedures for the provision of confidential information to first responders and medical personnel without compromising the secrecy of the information. Those who receive trade secret information under this provision of EPCRA are subject to criminal prosecution if they disclose this information.
Enforcement of EPCRA is through both civil and criminal penalties. EPCRA also contains a citizen suit provision that creates a private right of action. In North Carolina the requirements of EPCRA are implemented through the North Carolina Emergency Management Act and the North Carolina Hazardous Materials Response Act. The latter is a responsibility of the Division of Emergency Management. The former is the responsibility of the Governor who has broad emergency powers. Local responsibility for implementation of the North Carolina Emergency Management Act is vested in the county governing authority.