|
Evolution and Diversity -- page 2
|
![]() A polychaete worm |
The First ArthropodsA variety of marine worms (Annelida and Protoannelida) lived in the ocean sediments during the Cambrian period. These creatures were bilaterally symmetrical, soft-bodied, and multisegmented. They had no distinct head capsule and lacked both eyes and antennae. Some species may have had lobe-like lateral appendages similar to the parapodia of polychaete worms that thrive in the muddy sediments of today's ocean floor. But structural differences between the lateral appendages of polychaetes and early arthropods suggest that these two groups diverged from a common annelid ancestor some 500-600 million years ago. All annelids were soft-bodied. They decayed rapidly after death and were not well-preserved in the fossil record.
Velvet worms may or may not prove to be direct ancestors of the arthropods, but regardless of classification, it seems reasonable to assume that the very first arthropods were distinctly worm-like in structure and appearance. They were also different in at least one important way: they had an exoskeleton. This structure, secreted by epidermal cells, was more rigid than annelid cuticle and necessitated membranous "joints" to provide the flexibility needed for movement. This exoskeleton (and its jointed appendages) is the hallmark of the arthropods. |
Arthropod EvolutionA classical controversy that still rages among invertebrate zoologists, including the entomologists, relates to the evolutionary pathway (or pathways) of adaptive radiation that arthropods followed as they gradually diverged from primitive ancestors. The traditional, and certainly more conservative approach, assumes that arthropods arose only once from protoannelid ancestors. This monophyletic argument is based on the observation that many features, such as the exoskeleton, open circulatory system, hemocoel, etc., are shared by nearly all taxa within the group and appear to be homologous (i.e. have the same evolutionary origin). A contrary view is taken by other biologists who argue that arthropod-like organisms must have evolved more than once (perhaps as many as four times) in geological history. Support for this polyphyletic approach is found in embryological development and in comparative studies of the mouthparts and other appendages. Proponents of the polyphyletic hypothesis claim that many similarities between taxa have arisen coincidentally, through the process of evolutionary convergence. |
![]()
|
All arthropods differ from their annelid ancestors in several important ways: they have a chitinous exoskeleton, jointed/segmented appendages, a well-developed head and mouthparts, striated muscles, and an open circulatory system with a dorsal heart. Unlike annelids, the arthropods produce large, yolk-laden eggs that are encased in a proteinaceous shell. Ciliated nephridia, paired segmental excretory organs found in annelids and onychophorans, have been replaced in arthropods by specialized excretory organs located on the head (green glands in crustacea), near the legs (coxal glands in horseshoe crabs), or in the abdomen (Malpighian tubules in terrestrial arthropods). Remarkable similarities in the chemical composition of the exoskeleton and in the ultrastructure of the compound eyes in organisms as diverse as millipedes, shrimp, and horseshoe crabs provide strong evidence that all of these groups (myriapods, crustaceans, and chelicerates) must have evolved from a common ancestor.
Boudreaux's classification scheme excludes onychophorans because they lack a true exoskeleton, but other workers disagree. Meglitsch and Schram (1991) regard the Onychophora as closely related to myriapods. In their monophyletic classification scheme (Cladogram 3), Crustacea and Chelicerata are the most primitive groups. Insects, myriapods, and onychophora are grouped together in the superclass Uniramia because of similarities in leg structure and locomotion. A great deal of controversy surrounds the evolution of arthropod legs and wings. Proponents of monophyletic classification argue that the legs of all arthropods are homologous (have a common evolutionary origin); opponents claim there is too much diversity in leg structure to justify a single ancestor. Jarmila Kukalová-Peck, a Canadian entomologist, has proposed that "primitive" arthropods may have had as many as eleven segments in each walking leg. She cites evidence from an extinct fossil insect to support her claim that the eight-segmented legs of spiders, the seven- to nine-segmented legs of crustacea, and the five-segmented legs of insects all exhibit some degree of reduction from the "primitive" groundplan. | ||||
If we embrace the idea of polyphyletic origins, then arthropods are represented by as many as four major phyla -- each of which is presumed to have evolved separately from primitive annelid ancestors:
Embryological development of the head and mouthparts has also been offered as evidence to support the polyphyletic hypothesis. In myriapods and insects, the head is a separate functional region. But in the crustacea and the chelicerata, the head and thorax develop together as a single body region, the cephalothorax. Furthermore, within the myriapods and insects there is evidence that additional segments are added to form mouthparts, suggesting that the mouthparts of chelicerates, crustaceans, and other arthropods are not homologous. |
![]() ![]() Symphyla |
The MyriapodsRegardless of whether we adopt a monophyletic or a polyphyletic classification scheme, it is apparent that the insects have more in common with the myriapods than with any other taxon of the Arthropoda. Insects and myriapods are adapted to a terrestrial lifestyle, exhibit similar embryological development, and share many similarities in the morphology of the head and mouthparts.
All myriapods exhibit ametabolous development (there is no significant change in body form as they mature). Eggs hatch into immatures (called young) that are similar to adults in most respects except size and sexual maturity. Like all other arthropods, they grow by molting, but they may also increase in length by adding an additional body segment at each molt. This type of growth (called anamorphosis) is common in myriapods, but it occurs only rarely in more "advanced" arthropods and is usually regarded as a "primitive" characteristic (pleisiomorphic condition).
Most biologists and paleontologists feel that there is sufficient morphological, embryological, and fossil evidence to justify a claim that the basic structural plan of the insect head evolved very early in the myriapod lineage. As the head assumed a more prominent role in the organism's survival, it increased in size and usefulness by assimilating adjacent trunk or body segments that previously had been adapted for locomotion. In this process of cephalization, the leg appendages evolved into mouthparts that became adapted for catching, processing, or manipulating food items. These mouthparts are said to be segmentally homologous with walking legs. Indeed, if this is the case, we might expect to find "primitive" organisms that have only mandibles (monognathous), "less primitive" organisms having both mandibles and maxillae (dignathous), and "advanced" organisms with mandibles, first maxillae, and second maxillae (trignathous). In fact, monognathous forms have never been found (living or fossilized), but the dignathous condition occurs in Pauropoda and Diplopoda, and trignathous mouthparts are found in centipedes, symphylans, and all hexapods (including insects and their close relatives). The symphylans and the hexapods (but not the centipedes) have experienced an anatomical fusion of the second maxillae. This medial fusion of the left and right side appendage has produced a mouthpart called the labium. It is tempting to interpret this structural similarity as evidence of a close evolutionary affinity between Symphyla and Insecta. In fact, this was the basis for the "symphylan theory" of insect evolution that was proposed by Calman and Imms in 1936. Despite its intuitive appeal, the "symphylan theory" is not widely accepted today because of other, more extensive differences in leg and abdominal structure between these two groups. |
Next Page: The Hexapods |
|
Last Updated: 11 November 2011 Return to ENT 425 Homepage |
John R. Meyer
Department of Entomology NC State University |