
|
Biological Control
Natural control strategies that employ biological agents for pest suppression are generally classified as biological control tactics. In conventional usage, this term usually refers to the practice of rearing and releasing natural enemies: parasites, predators, or pathogens.
Biocontrol agents include a wide variety of life forms, including vertebrates, invertebrates, fungi, and microorganisms. These beneficial species are common in most natural communities and, although their presence is often unnoticed, they help maintain the "balance of nature" by regulating the density of their host or prey population. Insect species often become "pests" when this ecological balance is disrupted by natural events or human intervention. Biological pest control strives to reestablish this balance in one of three ways: |
![]() ![]() Parasitic nematode |
Just because an insect is a predator or a parasite does not necessarily make it a good biological control agent. Since the early 1900's over 600 species of beneficial insects have been introduced into the United States. Of these, only about 20% have been outright successes as biological control agents; another 35% have been partially successful, and the other 45% never became established or failed to have any significant effect on pest populations. From these successes and failures, entomologists have concluded that introduced biocontrol agents are most effective when they exhibit the following characteristics: |
![]() ![]() Lacewing larva |
Biological control is a particularly appealing pest control alternative because, unlike most other tactics, it does not always have to be reapplied each time a pest outbreak occurs. Once natural enemies are released into a new environment, there is a good chance they will become established and provide a self-perpetuating form of control. Biological control is also the only control tactic that increases, rather than decreases, the species diversity within an agroecosystem. This increased diversity often results in greater stability because wild fluctuations in population density are less common in communities with a diverse food web. |
![]() Parasitic wasp |
Biological control is not a "quick fix" for most pest problems. Natural enemies usually take longer to suppress a pest population than other forms of pest control and farmers often regard this as a disadvantage. It also may be difficult to "integrate" natural enemies into a crop or commodity when pesticides are still in use. Beneficial insects are often highly sensitive to pesticides and their resurgence (recovery to pre-spray densities) is usually much slower than that of pest populations. Rapid pest resurgence often leads to a vicious cycle of continued chemical usage that prevents natural enemies from ever becoming reestablished.
Perhaps the greatest potential for future progress in biological control lies in improving the success of microbial pathogens. Many of these organisms are highly desirable as biocontrol agents: they attack a narrow range of insect hosts, they are not hazardous to humans or domestic animals, and they do not pose a threat to the environment. As a group, though, pathogens have never proven to be quite as reliable as other forms of pest control. They are vulnerable to desiccation, ultraviolet radiation, and high temperatures. They may not survive long enough in the environment to encounter a host, and even if they survive, their virulence may be too low to overcome the host's defenses.
A great deal of research is still needed before we can begin to benefit from the full potential of biocontrol. Fortunately, new developments in biotechnology may soon enable us to create new strains of microbial pathogens that are more virulent, easier to mass produce, and less sensitive to temperature and humidity. Work is currently underway to transform a common soil microbe, Pseudomonas fluorescens, into a pathogen of soil-dwelling insects by implanting the delta-endotoxin gene from Bacillus thuringiensis. Clearly, there are major changes in biocontrol that lie just over the horizon.
|
|
Last Updated: 4 November 2003 Return to ENT 425 Homepage |
John R. Meyer
Department of Entomology NC State University |