Review: Pankiw (2009). Journal of Medical Entomology, 46: 782-788.
Written: September 1, 2009
Posted: 09/08/09
Word count: 669
Question: Can you spray something on you to reduce bee stings?
Answer: DEET, no; but MeA, yes!
The latter half of the 19th century
is considered by most apiculture historians to be the golden age of
beekeeping innovation. The quintessential breakthrough was the application
of the bee space in L. L. Langstroth’s moveable-frame beehive,
which truly revolutionized bee management into what we know it today.
During the same period, however, several other notable inventions were
introduced. The radial extractor, invented in 1865 by the Italian beekeeper
Major Franz Endler von Hruschka, enabled beekeepers to harvest honey
using centrifugal force rather than destroying the combs. Wax foundation,
and later imbedded with wires, provided honey combs with the structural
rigidity to withstand such forces, which was also introduced around
this time (by John Mehring and J. F. Hetherington, respectively).
Moreover, in 1870, an American
beekeeper named Moses Quinby developed the first bellowed bee smoker,
which improved the longevity of a stable fire and enabled beekeepers
to waft smoke directly onto the bees. While the use of smoke to pacify
the bees dates prior to human history, the delivery devices up until
that time were fairly primitive (such as straw bundles, used by the
primitive peoples, or bowls of smoldering cow dung (!), used by the
ancient Egyptians). Decreasing the defensiveness of a honey bee colony
greatly facilitates the practice of beekeeping and minimizes stings,
for which we are all grateful.
Modern technological innovators,
therefore, have attempted to develop chemical products that can be
applied beforehand to prevent or dissuade stinging insects from physically
stinging. Indeed, doing so can be important for public health and not
just to beekeepers, as there are dozens of fatalities from insect venom
every year in the US (the vast majority of which, however, are not from
honey bees but rather yellow jackets or other wasps). Unlike the case
for biting and blood-feeding insects, where numerous products such
as DEET have been shown to be extremely effective at deterring mosquitoes
and ticks, there has yet to be a product that shows promise to deter
stinging insects. Until now.
A new report by Tanya Paniw
of Texas A&M University tested the chemical methyl anthranilate
(MeA) for this very purpose. This chemical is nontoxic to bees and
people, and it is naturally occurring in grapes (it is even used as
a food additive). She tested this product in two ways. First, she used
the standard black-leather assay on colonies of Africanized honey bees
(which, needless to say, are widespread in Texas and more predisposed
to defensive behavior). The assay works by waving a leather target
(in this case, foam balls covered in black leather) in front of a colony
for a pre-determined period of time and then later counting the number
of stings imbedded in the leather (=stinging response). In the present
study, the leather was sprayed either with water (control) or MeA (treatment)
for comparison at different distances from the entrance of the AHB
hives. She found that the MeA treated targets received 80% fewer stings
than did the control targets, which is exceedingly effective.
Second, she placed special
packets of MeA under wooden overhangs—the very places that paper
wasps love to build their nests. She found that, compared to untreated
controls, that MeA was 100% effective at deterring wasps from constructing
their nests. This suggests that MeA may be an effective deterrent for
venomous social insects building their nests in unwanted places.
It is too early, of course,
to recommend that beekeepers hose down their suits with methyl anthranilate,
as more studies need to be conducted and any potential product carefully
tested. However, this is an exciting finding for those who have been
seeking a key innovation in the development of an effective prevention
of stings.
Reference
Pankiw, T. (2009). Reducing honey bee defensive responses
and social wasp colonization with methyl anthranilate. Journal of
Medical Entomology, 46: 782-788.
|