MINERALOGY & CHARGE PROPERTIES OF
DISPERSIBLE COLLOIDALS


Fractionation of Clays for Mineralogical Analysis

Fractionation of Bulk Water Dispersible Clay

One hundred gram portions of soil sample were suspended in 9.5 L glass containers in distilled water by shaking end-over-end for 30 seconds. Suspensions were allowed to stand for 24 hours until the silt had settled below the sampling point and clays were siphoned off. Containers were refilled with distilled water and the extraction was repeated two times. If less than 5.5 gm of sample was obtained, a second 100 gm portion of the sample was extracted. Extracted clay suspensions lay extracts were flocculated by addition of NaCl.

Na2CO3 Dispersion for Coarse- and Fine-Clay Fractions

One hundred gram portions of the samples were suspended in 1L containers with 400 mL of distilled water and 100 mL of saturated NaCl. Suspensions were shaken for 30 minutes and allowed to stand over night before the clear supernatant was discarded. Samples were transferred to 9.5L containers and filled pH 10 water. The dispersing solution was prepared by addition of 100mL of saturated Na2CO3 to 1 L of distilled water. Suspensions were allowed to stand for 24 hours until the silt had settled below the sampling point. Suspensions were refilled with dispersing solution and the process was repeated until the solution was clear. Coarse (2.0-0.2µm) and fine clays (<0.2µm) were separated using super centrifugation, and the resulting suspensions were flocculated with NaCl.

Primary Soil Characterization

Detailed descriptions of individual methods can be found in: Soil Survey Staff. 1992. Soil Survey Laboratory Methods Manual. Soil Survey Investigations Report No. 42, Version 2.0. 400 pages.

Elemental Composition of Soil and Clay Fractions

The three clay fractions, water-dispersible clay (WDC), coarse clay (CC), and fine clay (FC), were rinsed with ethanol to remove excess NaCl from the fractionation procedure, powdered using an agate mortar and pestle, and digested in Teflon bombs using HF and Aqua Regia (Bernas, 1968). Digests were analyzed for elemental composition by ICP with results reported on an oxide basis. Elements considered for this analysis were Si, Al, Fe, Mg, K, Ca, Mn, and Na. Sodium concentrations were assumed to represent the exchangeable phase of the clays as it would be expected to be the saturating cation as a result of dispersion and subsequent flocculating process for concentrating the sample prior to analysis.

X-Ray Diffraction and Thermal Analysis

X-ray diffraction, thermal gravimetric analysis (TGA), and differential scanning calorimetry (DSC) were performed on the water- and chemically-dispersed clay fractions, the latter of which was further divided into coarse (2-0.2 µm) and fine (< 0.2 µm) clay fractions, to quantify smectite, hydroxy-interlayered smectite and vermiculite, gibbsite, goethite, kaolinite, and chlorite contents.

Neutron Activation Analysis of WDC

Approximately 100 to 800 mg of each sample were encapsulated in polyethylene vials and irradiated together with standards and flux wires with a thermal neutron flux of 7X1012 n/cm2s at the McMaster Nuclear Reactor. After a seven day decay, activities of the samples were measured on a high purity Ge detector with a resolution of 1.63 KeV for the 60Co photopeak. Two batches of Kirkland Bt clay sample were received from two different shipments and the samples were analyzed separately on different dates. In general, analytical errors would not be expected to exceed 15% on the basis of the results at the Oak Ridge National Laboratory Neutron Activation Facility. Detection limits of most rare-earth and actinide elements analyzed were less than 10% of the actual concentrations of the elements presented in Table 18. The less than symbol ì<ì in Table 18 indicates the analytical results were below detection limits for the elements.

Statistical Analysis

Statistical analysis was performed on the results using the JMP V3.1 statistical software package developed by the SAS Institute, Inc. (Cary, NC).


| Next Section | Previous Section | Return to Contents |

Last Modified: September 30, 1998

Document Prepared by:
North Carolina Agricultural Research Service
North Carolina State University